The ORM Foundation

Get the facts!

Search

Page 7 of 8 (78 items) « First ... < Previous 4 5 6 7 8 Next >
  • Re: Modeling based an existence chain

    Hi Marc, This is, if I&#39;m not mistaken, a DDL script based on the ORM diagram I posted. I was looking, rather, for some indication of what is the schema that you&#39;re trying to write your constraint for, in SQL. But maybe I should make sure of&nbsp;this&nbsp;question first: Are you planning to re-do a current relational schema (to make it ...
    Posted to ORM Techniques (Forum) by Andy Carver on Thu, May 19 2011
  • Re: Modeling based an existence chain

    Hi Marc, I have responded in-line, like &nbsp;&gt;&gt; this [quote user=&quot;mnnoon&quot;] Yes that seems to reflect accurately the way I currently&nbsp;want to design the database, thanks.&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt;&gt; Good, now we can go ahead and address finer details (e.g. see below). ... I&#39;m not sure how you added those light&nbsp;blue ...
    Posted to ORM Techniques (Forum) by Andy Carver on Sun, May 15 2011
  • Re: Modeling based an existence chain

    Hi Marc, &nbsp;Does the below seem to reflect accurately the fact types and business logic in view in the domain (of your &quot;watered-down example&quot;)? &nbsp; I gather that the actual, existing database has a &quot;CostOfLiving&quot; table. This seems like something that needs correcting, rather than reflecting accurately the fact types of ...
    Posted to ORM Techniques (Forum) by Andy Carver on Sat, May 14 2011
  • Re: Modeling based an existence chain

    Hi Marc, Sounds like an interesting modeling problem. I think it would make it clearer, however, if you could give&nbsp;one or two concrete examples (e.g. table rows) of data used in these fields... and maybe even offer an interpretation of these data use cases. If you can&#39;t share any of the real data, please invent one or two such examples. ...
    Posted to ORM Techniques (Forum) by Andy Carver on Wed, May 11 2011
  • Re: Graphically depicting derived fact types

    Hi Roger, Due to your patience and persistence, I&#39;ve some good news to report. I&#39;ve found what the real problem was, with the behavior I was excoriating in Visio 12 and ff., and have fixed this problem in the stencil. So, you should now be able to re-color the whole fact type, or individual roles (if desired), without such anomalies as ...
    Posted to User experience (Forum) by Andy Carver on Mon, May 9 2011
  • Re: Graphically depicting derived fact types

    Thank you&nbsp;Roger, you&#39;ve reminded me of this (annoying) problem that, as it turns out, is in Visio 2007 as well (and maybe 2003). Visio 10 (2002) does behave as I described, which is a very helpful feature; but that got screwed up somewhere along the way, and unfortunately it appears they&#39;ve yet to&nbsp;fix it. As you&#39;ve ...
    Posted to User experience (Forum) by Andy Carver on Sun, May 8 2011
  • Re: Graphically depicting derived fact types

    P.S. I just realized that if the above suggestion works in your Visio, then adding some custom property, say -- which would require moving from the context menu to the Custom Properties menu, to select one&#39;s desired color -- would not save the user even a mouse-click, but rather, only the moving of the mouse-pointer to a sub-menu. So let me ...
    Posted to User experience (Forum) by Andy Carver on Sun, May 8 2011
  • Re: Graphically depicting derived fact types

    Hi Roger, Thanks for your perceptive post. I agree that it needs to be pretty easy, in Visio for example, to change the shading of the role boxes to some color you use a lot (e.g. to denote derivation). And I would certainly want to make&nbsp;it easy enough in the Visio stencil. However, I do want to&nbsp;mention that I&nbsp;have not found it ...
    Posted to User experience (Forum) by Andy Carver on Sun, May 8 2011
  • Re: Representing common consistency constraints

    Hi Roger, Terry has brought to my attention your request regarding the ORM2_Draw2 Visio stencil. I&#39;ve just uploaded a new version (11) that adds a &quot;link binary&quot; fact type shape. Also I&nbsp;added a couple of paragraphs&nbsp;to the readme file, in the section on &quot;Use of the new features&quot;,&nbsp;regarding this shape and its ...
    Posted to User experience (Forum) by Andy Carver on Sun, May 8 2011
  • Re: Value Type or Fact Type for population-wide aggregates

    Hi Clifford, Interesting example, but I&#39;d say you were on the right track with your unary fact type but were somewhat misled by thinking the cardinality constraint (of #1)applied to the &quot;value&quot; type. Actually, there is a cardinality constraint, but not on the value type so much as on the role. For example, if I had the unary fact ...
    Posted to ORM Techniques (Forum) by Andy Carver on Wed, Jan 19 2011
Page 7 of 8 (78 items) « First ... < Previous 4 5 6 7 8 Next >
© 2008-2022 The ORM Foundation: A UK not-for-profit organisation -------------- Terms of Service