The ORM Foundation

thanks! it is better. should have thought of it myself...

Well I still don't know what was the problem, but I've erased the fact types and rewritten them, and the exclamation marks are gone. Though I'm still wondering how come the Error List didn't show any errors. Cheers 

opps...here is the list for the aboove post

 Hi Again... I can't figure out the meaning of the exclamation marks on some fact types (especially as there are no errors according to the list). any ideas?   I've attached the list and the diagram, just in case. Thanks! 

 Hi Terry, I've noticed that once I add derivation rules, the derived fact types are erased from the relational view. Could you help me understand the reason for this? For instance, for the attached diagram only one table is generated, the WBT, with two columns (WBTId and FTPCode). Cheers 

 Hello, When switching the context window, the initial view is usually messed up. Even if its a simple diagram, shapes get all mixed up (shapes placed on the left side of the designing pane jump to the right, etc.). Anything I can do to overcome this? Thanks 

 Hi Terry, would you kindly explain when should each of these options should be used?  Thanks 

Got it!

Hi Terry, Sorry, but I'm still confused. Would you kindly relate your explanation to this diagram?  As i understand it, each Man can have at most one Hat, and each hat may belongs to more than one man. Are you saying that both roles are implied mandatory? So that each Man must have exactly one Hat, and each hat must belong to at ...

 hi, Generally speaking i find the report very useful. what I haven't yet found is an easy way for my clients to communicate their remarks on the report. Is there a recommended way? I tried Diigo, which i find very useful on web pages, but it doesn't seem to work on the report. I've noticed the check boxes beside each ...